On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 16:43:05 +0530, Arun Raghavan <arun at accosted.net> wrote: > On 18 Sep 2014 15:35, "Colin Leroy" <colin at colino.net> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:10:30 +0200, Colin Leroy <colin at colino.net> > > wrote: > > > > > > So what's needed to start looking at pushing this upstream? I > > > > don't have any ROAP devices to test with, but can try to help > > > > with reviews (and maybe hunt for something that can do ROAP ... > > > > XBMC?). > > > > > > I just have to brace myself and send the patchset for review! > > > > There are 55 of them, is it OK to send them here? > > That would get messy quickly. A link to a branch would work better. > If it's already on GitHub, we could just use the review mechanism > there for simplicity. Thanks. I hope I've done that well; my first repository wasn't ideally planned (with everything in master), I've made a new one. The branch is raop2 at https://github.com/colinleroy/pulseaudio You can see all commits there: https://github.com/colinleroy/pulseaudio/compare/pulseaudio:master...raop2 Thanks in advance. -- Colin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20140918/4fa43811/attachment.sig>
