On Sat, 2013-01-05 at 08:32 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 17:27 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > On 01/04/2013 07:59 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:35 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > >> What problem are you trying to fix here? It's not obvious why the sample > > >> format information should be removed, why not the rate and channels > > >> while we are at it? And even if this is needed, I guess there's dead > > >> code to parse the argument that should be removed in the _init routine? > > > > > > The patch title refers to bug 46529, I guess you missed that? Here's the > > > link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46529 > > > > > > I hope that makes things clearer. As for removing dead code from > > > pa__init(), that's not necessary, because the format argument was parsed > > > by pa_modargs_get_sample_spec_and_channel_map(). There's no dead code to > > > remove. > > > > My point was that there are multiple modules that were derived from this > > initial virtual sink contributed about 3 years ago, and if you want to > > be consistent all of them should be cleaned (source, eq, surround, > > echo-cancel, etc). Rather than removing the option once you may want to > > either remove this option everywhere or fix the bug by introducing the > > required conversion. Good point about checking the derived modules too. It seems that module-equalizer-sink has the same bug, while module-echo-cancel and module-virtual-surround-sink support the format option but ignore it. module-virtual-source supports the option too, and also uses it without problems. I originally thought, for some reason, that it would be non-trivial to fix module-virtual-sink to work with any sample format. That should not be the case (the module only needs to copy samples without converting anything), so I think the way forward is to add the format support back to module-virtual-sink, and remove the support from module-equalizer-sink, module-echo-cancel and module-virtual-surround-sink. > Or, since this is merely meant to be a module that other modules are > meant to be based on, put that as a big comment for derivative modules > to deal with, and leave the modarg as is. > > Tangentially, we should also not actually installing > module-virtual-{sink,source} I disagree. They are useful modules, I have used them for testing sink volume code. -- Tanu