[PATCH] UCM patches on ubuntu 1:1.1-0ubuntu4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/2/25 Arun Raghavan <arun.raghavan at collabora.co.uk>:
> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 15:39 +0800, Feng Wei wrote:
>> Hi David,
>> I'm appreciated for your comments. UCM really has a long way to go.
>
> IMO it's not that bad. While I haven't gone over the code at all, I've
> used it on an OMAP4 and it does work (which is pretty neat to see!).
>
>> 2012/2/24 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>:
>> > On 02/21/2012 04:34 AM, Feng Wei wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Arun,
>> >> I'm not clear what should I do to upstream patches. I tested them on
>> >> ubuntu, so that I must follow what David had done in port structure.
>> >> In my original mind, I will first upstream to ubuntu, then pulseaudio
>> >> community.
>> >> My current patches are maintained in bzr according to ubuntu, I want
>> >> them to be merged in ubuntu branch.
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Feng,
>> >
>> > Sorry I haven't responded earlier, but I'm not sure what to do about these
>> > patches either. As I see it there are at least three problems that need to
>> > be resolved:
>> >
>> > ?* The competing implementation problem: We've had multiple implementations
>> > posted to the PulseAudio mailinglist, one by Janos and Jaska, one by
>> > Alejandro and Margarita (probably discontinued?), and one by yourself. It
>> > would be great if the UCM community could give us a hint on why we should
>> > choose one over another.
>> Exactly. Maybe one reason is my patch is the only one to implement the
>> agreed concepts mapping between PA and alsa-lib.
>
> Going by Mark's comments, While it'd be nice to hear from Janos and
> Jaska as well, since yours is the only actual code that is available and
> being taken forward through the merging process, I think we're fine
> going ahead with it.
>
>> > ?* The patches are based on an older version of PulseAudio - the one that
>> > uses the input devices for jack detection. Ubuntu 12.04, as well as
>> > PulseAudio 2.0, will release with the new kcontrol jack detection interface
>> > [1]. In essence, your patches do not apply, and should we consider these for
>> > Ubuntu 12.04 and/or PulseAudio 2.0 we're in quite a hurry. Perhaps it's even
>> > too late, I don't know.
>> It's really too late. I'll follow the new jack detection method and
>> update my patches tho.
>
> We're trying for much quicker releases now, so missing the 2.0 boat
> really isn't catastrophic at all.
>
> So if you could rebase and send these in a more review-friendly format
> (git send-email or a git tree somewhere), that would help move this
> forwards. We might have our hands full for a short while getting the
> outstanding patches and bugs done for 2.0, but I'd certainly like to try
> to get this in for 3.0 (i.e., the next release) if everything looks
> good.
Surely I will make it in good shape and send the patch again.
>
> -- Arun
>
> _______________________________________________
> pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
> pulseaudio-discuss at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss



-- 
Wei.Feng (irc wei_feng)
Linaro Multimedia Team
Linaro.org???Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow?Linaro:?Facebook?|?Twitter?|?Blog


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux