On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:39:44PM +0800, Feng Wei wrote: > 2012/2/24 David Henningsson <david.henningsson at canonical.com>: > > ?* The competing implementation problem: We've had multiple implementations > > posted to the PulseAudio mailinglist, one by Janos and Jaska, one by > > Alejandro and Margarita (probably discontinued?), and one by yourself. It > > would be great if the UCM community could give us a hint on why we should > > choose one over another. > Exactly. Maybe one reason is my patch is the only one to implement the > agreed concepts mapping between PA and alsa-lib. At this point I think we just need something merging. If it's problematic we can always work on incremental fixes. I know the one Marga and Jorge were working on has been abandoned due as things were taking too long and they moved on to other things, I don't know if Feng has based his code off that or if he started from scratch yet again :/ Anyway, I think the thing to do is just to go with whatever someone actually has the time to work on and get it in then iterate incrementally to deal with the issues that remain (if any). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/attachments/20120224/1b4963e7/attachment.pgp>
