On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 09:42 +0000, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 08/02/11 15:34 did gyre and gimble: > > If there are no objections to this approach, we could expose the fading > > API via a property (set it to trigger a fade) and a signal (for the > > fade-done callback). > > > > For the completion notification, I realised we would just pass the > > callback to the _set_volume_with_ramping() function like the rest of the > > API, so nothing new needs to be done for that it seems. > > > > Now all that remains is to figure out whether this belongs in core or in > > an extension. I think it fits in core (a _with_ramping variant of > > existing core API), but I'm not a religious about it. :) > > Just to revive this thread since our meeting.... > > Now that we know the ramping stuff will be ripped out for 1.0 release > (by your good self Arun!), I guess we can put this on the back burner > for now? Oh, the irony! :) Yep, this will need to fade (:p) to the background. Pity, since the gst side power optimisation also gets postponed as a result, but hopefully it'll be something we can get back to soon after 1.0 (I'm an optimist! :D). Cheers, Arun
