'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 08/02/11 15:34 did gyre and gimble: > If there are no objections to this approach, we could expose the fading > API via a property (set it to trigger a fade) and a signal (for the > fade-done callback). > > For the completion notification, I realised we would just pass the > callback to the _set_volume_with_ramping() function like the rest of the > API, so nothing new needs to be done for that it seems. > > Now all that remains is to figure out whether this belongs in core or in > an extension. I think it fits in core (a _with_ramping variant of > existing core API), but I'm not a religious about it. :) Just to revive this thread since our meeting.... Now that we know the ramping stuff will be ripped out for 1.0 release (by your good self Arun!), I guess we can put this on the back burner for now? Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited [http://www.tribalogic.net/] Open Source: Mageia Contributor [http://www.mageia.org/] PulseAudio Hacker [http://www.pulseaudio.org/] Trac Hacker [http://trac.edgewall.org/]
