Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Jukka Kommeri<kommeri at cern.ch> wrote: > >>>> Another question, is it possible to split the stream from source to >>>> both rtp-send and local sink? >>>> >>>> >>> I am sorry? I don't get the question, but loopback= might be the >>> option your a re looking for. >>> >>> Lennart >>> >>> >> The loop of module-rtp-send has been the solution for me. But I have noticed >> that the stream that comes from the loopback goes through module-rtp-recv. >> It would reduce latency greatly if it went directly to local sink? >> >> -Jukka >> > > If I got your question correctly, what you want is to combine the > remote and local sink into a virtual sink, so when you connect a > stream to this virtual sink it goes both to the local and remote > sinks, right? This is what module-combine does with local sinks, but I > think I doesn't work with remote sinks because it would be very > difficult to maintain both sinks synchronized. But I'm not an expert > on this, so it might have some misinformation here. > Not quite, now I use the loop of module-rtp-send to be able to hear what I am saying. This sound stays quite long in the buffer of module-rtp-recv and it is a bit disturbing to hear your own voice with 100ms latency. I was just wondering if there is a way to pass that buffer and get the stream directly to local sink. -Jukka
