On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Jukka Kommeri<kommeri at cern.ch> wrote: >> >>> Another question, is it possible to split the stream from source to >>> both rtp-send and local sink? >>> >> >> I am sorry? I don't get the question, but loopback= might be the >> option your a re looking for. >> >> Lennart >> > > The loop of module-rtp-send has been the solution for me. But I have noticed > that the stream that comes from the loopback goes through module-rtp-recv. > It would reduce latency greatly if it went directly to local sink? > > -Jukka If I got your question correctly, what you want is to combine the remote and local sink into a virtual sink, so when you connect a stream to this virtual sink it goes both to the local and remote sinks, right? This is what module-combine does with local sinks, but I think I doesn't work with remote sinks because it would be very difficult to maintain both sinks synchronized. But I'm not an expert on this, so it might have some misinformation here. -- Jo?o Paulo Rechi Vita MSc Computer Science Student Computer Engineer IC / Unicamp http://jprvita.wordpress.com/
