{Disarmed} Re: Cannot register to Asterisk from pjsip.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/12/2015 03:47 PM, AJ NOURI wrote:
> Thanks Riberto, 
> Corrected, but still the same outcome:

I think is better you check the asterisk configuration.

>
> *408 (Request Timeout)*
>
> ./pjsua-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --id sip:101 at 192.168.22.10 <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.22.10> --registrar
> sip:192.168.22.10 --realm "*" --username 101 --password user101
>
> --end msg--
> 13:42:42.763   pjsua_core.c  .TX 540 bytes Request msg REGISTER/cseq=61089 (tdta0x7f7bc0001d40) to UDP *MailScanner
> warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 192.168.22.10:5060 <http://192.168.22.10:5060>:
> REGISTER sip:192.168.22.10 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.1:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj3t..o84FfxnPB.0zJMZVj0.XX8W.2uyS
> Max-Forwards: 70
> From: <sip:101@192.168.22.10 <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.22.10>>;tag=484sAHDsFM9zT8.j9Oyfjl-ACl37ri71
> To: <sip:101 at 192.168.22.10 <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.22.10>>
> Call-ID: d8LSfvCMCGNQiqMAFjAdqgEesyz3i7GO
> CSeq: 61089 REGISTER
> User-Agent: PJSUA v2.3 Linux-3.13.0.52/x86_64/glibc-2.19
> Contact: <sip:101 at 192.168.22.1:5060;ob>
> Expires: 300
> Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS
> Content-Length:  0
>
>
> --end msg--
> 13:42:43.260    pjsua_acc.c  ...SIP registration failed, status=408 (Request Timeout)
> 13:42:43.260    pjsua_acc.c  ...Scheduling re-registration retry for acc 2 in 295 seconds..
>
>
> The server is perfectly reachable:
>
> ping 192.168.22.10              
> PING 192.168.22.10 (192.168.22.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 192.168.22.10 <http://192.168.22.10>:
> icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.34 ms
> 64 bytes from *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 192.168.22.10 <http://192.168.22.10>:
> icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.336 ms
> 64 bytes from *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:* 192.168.22.10 <http://192.168.22.10>:
> icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.375 ms
> ^C
> --- 192.168.22.10 ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.336/0.684/1.342/0.465 ms
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Roberto Fichera <kernel at tekno-soft.it <mailto:kernel at tekno-soft.it>> wrote:
>
>     On 06/12/2015 03:26 PM, AJ NOURI wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>>     Hi Roberto,
>>     Tried with --realm "*"
>>
>>     ./pjsua-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --id sip:101 at f192.168.22.10 <mailto:sip:101 at f192.168.22.10> --registrar
>>     sip:192.168.22.10 *--realm "*"* --username 101 --password user101
>
>     there is an 'f' in you sip id, see below:
>
>     --id sip:101@*f*192.168.22.10
>
>>
>>
>>     --end msg--
>>     13:18:28.617   pjsua_core.c  .TX 542 bytes Request msg REGISTER/cseq=19598 (tdta0x18ed770) to UDP *MailScanner
>>     has detected a possible fraud attempt from "192.168.22.10:5060" claiming to be* *MailScanner warning: numerical
>>     links are often malicious:* 192.168.22.10:5060 <http://192.168.22.10:5060>:
>>     REGISTER sip:192.168.22.10 SIP/2.0
>>     Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.22.1:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj4SepQ9O-akxHk3dFrqqB.bNPZjDMy4fe
>>     Max-Forwards: 70
>>     From: <sip:101@f192.168.22.10> <mailto:sip:101 at f192.168.22.10>;tag=wnKcrBK8.2LFrTomN82Df149IIWUrQsh
>>     To: <sip:101 at f192.168.22.10> <mailto:sip:101 at f192.168.22.10>
>>     Call-ID: QH4lxZczkk89C3AVZOyNMqKxKPS89sQD
>>     CSeq: 19598 REGISTER
>>     User-Agent: PJSUA v2.3 Linux-3.13.0.52/x86_64/glibc-2.19
>>     Contact: <sip:101 at 192.168.22.1:5060;ob> <mailto:sip:101 at 192.168.22.1:5060;ob>
>>     Expires: 300
>>     Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS
>>     Content-Length:  0
>>
>>
>>     --end msg--
>>     13:18:29.117    pjsua_acc.c  ...*SIP registration failed, status=408 (Request Timeout)*
>>     13:18:29.117    pjsua_acc.c  ...Scheduling re-registration retry for acc 2 in 57 seconds..
>>
>>     This is the code observed, still doesn't help to explain the issue:
>>
>>     408 Request Timeout
>>         Couldn't find the user in time. The server could not produce a response within a suitable amount of time, for
>>         example, if it could not determine the location of the user in time. The client MAY repeat the request
>>         without modifications at any later time.
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Roberto Fichera <kernel at tekno-soft.it <mailto:kernel at tekno-soft.it>> wrote:
>>
>>         On 06/12/2015 02:59 PM, Roberto Fichera wrote:
>>>         On 06/12/2015 02:50 PM, AJ NOURI wrote:
>>>>         This time Trixbox (192.168.22.10) a linux desktop host (192.168.10.2) and a linux cli host (192.168.10.3)
>>>>         are in the same subnet, no routing.
>>>>
>>>>         Linphone from the desktop host (192.168.10.2) successfully register to Trixbox, but not pjsua (with same
>>>>         extension):
>>>>
>>>>         *./pjsua-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --id sip:101 at f192.168.22.10 <mailto:sip:101 at f192.168.22.10> --registrar
>>>>         sip:192.168.22.10 --realm * --username 101 --password user101*
>>>
>>>         The --realm * get expanded as --realm *pjsua-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu* because you have it in your current
>>>         directory
>>
>>         I meant expanded as --realm *pjsystest-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu*
>>
>>
>>>
>>>         try with --realm "*"
>>>
>>>>
>>>>         12:41:07.745 os_core_unix.c !pjlib 2.3 for POSIX initialized
>>>>         12:41:07.746 sip_endpoint.c  .Creating endpoint instance...
>>>>         12:41:07.746          pjlib  .select() I/O Queue created (0x1e000f0)
>>>>         12:41:07.746 sip_endpoint.c  .Module "mod-msg-print" registered
>>>>         12:41:07.746 sip_transport.  .Transport manager created.
>>>>         12:41:07.746   pjsua_core.c  .PJSUA state changed: NULL --> CREATED
>>>>         *12:41:07.746 pjsua_app_conf  Invalid SIP URI pjsystest-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu*
>>>>         12:41:07.746   pjsua_core.c  Shutting down, flags=0...
>>>>         12:41:07.746   pjsua_core.c  PJSUA state changed: CREATED --> CLOSING
>>>>         12:41:07.746   pjsua_call.c  .Hangup all calls..
>>>>         12:41:07.746  pjsua_media.c  .Call 0: deinitializing media..
>>>>         12:41:07.746  pjsua_media.c  .Call 1: deinitializing media..
>>>>         12:41:07.746  pjsua_media.c  .Call 2: deinitializing media..
>>>>         12:41:07.746  pjsua_media.c  .Call 3: deinitializing media..
>>>>         12:41:07.746   pjsua_pres.c  .Shutting down presence..
>>>>         12:41:08.752   pjsua_core.c  .Destroying...
>>>>         12:41:08.752  pjsua_media.c  .Shutting down media..
>>>>         12:41:08.752 sip_endpoint.c  .Destroying endpoing instance..
>>>>         12:41:08.752 sip_endpoint.c  .Module "mod-msg-print" unregistered
>>>>         12:41:08.752 sip_transport.  .Destroying transport manager
>>>>         12:41:08.752 sip_endpoint.c  .Endpoint 0x1df5358 destroyed
>>>>         12:41:08.752   pjsua_core.c  .PJSUA state changed: CLOSING --> NULL
>>>>         12:41:08.752   pjsua_core.c  .PJSUA destroyed...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:56 AM, AJ NOURI <ajn.bin at gmail.com <mailto:ajn.bin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Connectivity is OK.
>>>>
>>>>             linux1(pjsua), linux2(pjsua), Desktop linux(linphone) and Trixbox can ping/trace/ssh/http to each other .
>>>>
>>>>             On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:32 AM, ?? <sanfarloth at gmail.com <mailto:sanfarloth at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hello,
>>>>
>>>>                 What's your router setting? It seems like your packets are being blocked by router.
>>>>
>>>>                 2015-05-21 8:03 GMT+08:00 David Villasmil Govea <david.villasmil at gmail.com
>>>>                 <mailto:david.villasmil at gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>                     Hello,
>>>>
>>>>                     Did you run a trace on the asterisk side?
>>>>
>>>>                     On Thu 21 May 2015 at 01:59 AJ NOURI <ajn.bin at gmail.com <mailto:ajn.bin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>>                         I have a hard time registering to trixbox using pjsua from Linux machines (192.168.22.1 and
>>>>                         192.168.33.1)
>>>>                         topology:
>>>>                         https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzYXUSsUVFR_UkUtMkk4b18xNzQ/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>                         I have configured 3 extensions on the Asterisk call manager (192.168.0.125), here is an
>>>>                         example of Asterisk configuration:
>>>>                         https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzYXUSsUVFR_ZnpkMjFWbURwWnM/view?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>>                         I can register with any extension using Linphone (GUI SIP Phone) , located in 192.168.0.121
>>>>
>>>>                         Here is how I try to register from pjsua:
>>>>
>>>>                         >>> +a
>>>>                         Your SIP URL: (empty to cancel): sip:101 at 192.168.0.125 <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.0.125>
>>>>                         URL of the registrar: (empty to cancel): sip:192.168.0.125
>>>>                         Auth Realm: (empty to cancel): *
>>>>                         Auth Username: (empty to cancel): 101
>>>>                         Auth Password: (empty to cancel): user101
>>>>                         07:54:42.539    pjsua_acc.c  Adding account: id=sip:101 at 192.168.0.125
>>>>                         <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.0.125>
>>>>                         07:54:42.539    pjsua_acc.c  .Account sip:101 at 192.168.0.125
>>>>                         <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.0.125> added with id 0
>>>>                         07:54:42.540    pjsua_acc.c  .Acc 0: setting registration..
>>>>                         07:54:42.540   pjsua_core.c  ...TX 538 bytes Request msg REGISTER/cseq=317 (tdta0x2130d20)
>>>>                         to UDP *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "192.168.0.125:5060"
>>>>                         claiming to be* *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:*
>>>>                         192.168.0.125:5060 <http://192.168.0.125:5060>:
>>>>                         REGISTER sip:192.168.0.125 SIP/2.0
>>>>                         Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.33.1:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj.yCkzLqEWHrpvyKuN4P35HKwfpfWcgz8
>>>>                         Max-Forwards: 70
>>>>                         From: <sip:101@192.168.0.125
>>>>                         <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.0.125>>;tag=01KRw5An8aWhj7N3tQLsxVdSNR-rxTOS
>>>>                         To: <sip:101 at 192.168.0.125 <mailto:sip%3A101 at 192.168.0.125>>
>>>>                         Call-ID: A9IR4N9vlT5KiqNc.bNVf2XTWq8OyOsu
>>>>                         CSeq: 317 REGISTER
>>>>                         User-Agent: PJSUA v2.3 Linux-3.13.0.52/x86_64/glibc-2.19
>>>>                         Contact: <sip:101 at 192.168.33.1:5060;ob> <mailto:sip:101 at 192.168.33.1:5060;ob>
>>>>                         Expires: 300
>>>>                         Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE,
>>>>                         OPTIONS
>>>>                         Content-Length:  0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                         --end msg--
>>>>
>>>>                         *<...> After multiple tries*
>>>>
>>>>                         --end msg--
>>>>                         07:55:51.544    pjsua_acc.c  ...SIP registration failed, status=408 (Request Timeout)
>>>>                         07:55:51.544    pjsua_acc.c  ...Scheduling re-registration retry for acc 0 in 294 seconds..
>>>>
>>>>                         And here is the tcpdump showing pjsua registering without response from the server:
>>>>                         https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzYXUSsUVFR_eE1NRjRRS3psOUE/view?usp=sharing 
>>>>
>>>>                         Note that point-to-point SIP test between 2 pjsua works perfectly.
>>>>
>>>>                         _______________________________________________
>>>>                         Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>                         pjsip mailing list
>>>>                         pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>>>                         http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     _______________________________________________
>>>>                     Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>                     pjsip mailing list
>>>>                     pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>>>                     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 _______________________________________________
>>>>                 Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>                 pjsip mailing list
>>>>                 pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>>>                 http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>>
>>>>         pjsip mailing list
>>>>         pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>>>         http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>>
>>>         pjsip mailing list
>>>         pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>>         http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>>         pjsip mailing list
>>         pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>         http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>>     pjsip mailing list
>>     pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>>     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
>     pjsip mailing list
>     pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
>     http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20150612/0e6c8e33/attachment.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux