RFC5626 non-standard behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Gustavo <ggb at tid.es> wrote:
>> One of the easier workaround is to shorten the keep alive interval to
>> say slightly less than half of what your server setting is, I think
>> that should cover problem no 3 and 4.
>
> 3. If you don't control the server you don't know what the Flow-Timer is
> going to be to manually configure it in the client.

Sure. I already acknowledged what are missing. So do you have the
control over the server or not? If yes, why complain? If no, well too
bad then.

> 4. If you are sending a lot of INVITEs, MESSAGEs.... you are not going
> to send any CRLFCRLF keepalive and the server will assume the connection
> is broken.
>

Why would you disconnect a perfectly fine connection with a lot of
messages going?


>> > Any idea of what is the problem?
>> >
>>
>> There's no way to tell without seeing the stack trace.
>
> Find attached a screenshot with the stack trace.
>

Still no idea, sorry.



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux