Hey Benny, Long time! How are you doing? I've seen post in the past that since the media IO is performed using a single thread, that scaling it to a vast number of channels may affect performance. I'm just a noob spectator in this list and in no way familiar with the code in this regard so feel free to humiliate me publicly :-) Joegen On Monday, 13 September, 2010 01:09 PM, Benny Prijono wrote: > Joegen, I'm not clear with no 3? > > Best regards, > Benny > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Joegen E. Baclor > <joegen.baclor at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think you should narrow down your question to specific components and ask >> the question how to achive each component using the different modules to >> pjproject exposes. IMO the following components are a must in a workable >> PBX framework. You might get a better answer if you will be more specific. >> >> 1. Registrar - (Yes) >> 2. SIP Proxy router (or B2BUA) - (Yes) >> 3. Media Server (Auto-attendant, MoH, Voicemail) - (Yes) but i've seen >> post in this list that pjmedia is not wired and therefore would not perform >> well in a multi-channel environmnet >> 4. SIP Trunk compatibility layer (ISTP interoperability) - (Yes) >> 5. RTP Proxy for NAT traversal - (Yes) >> 6. Payload Transcoders - (Yes) >> 7. Device provisioning - (No) >> 8. ISDN interface (if you plan to support POTS in the PBX) - (No) >> >> Joegen >> >> On Saturday, 11 September, 2010 02:58 PM, Jonas Gauffin wrote: >> >> Hello, >> Is the pjsip stack suitable to create a pbx? >> If so, which layer do you recommend me to use? >> Regards, >> Jonas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> >
