Bharat, Unfortunately the wireshark trace couldn't be opened here, and I think it may be better to see the pjsua log file, as the patch would print some warning message regarding the issue in the log file. BR, nanang On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Bharat Yadav <bharat.yadav at axisconvergence.com> wrote: > Dear Nanang > I tested Session timer fix with revision svn 2961 but still having same as > before. Wireshark trace attached.(forget to attach file now with this one) > Thanks and regards > Bharat Yadav > > -----Original Message----- > From: pjsip-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org] > On Behalf Of Nanang Izzuddin > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:15 AM > To: pjsip list > Subject: Re: Session Timer Too Small > > Hi Bharat, > > Just want to update you regarding this issue. There was update on > ticket #954, i.e: rev 2933-2934, to handle this case. > > Please drop in any feedback once you've got a chance to test it, thanks. > > BR, > nanang > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang at pjsip.org> wrote: >> Hi Bharat, >> >> The log does help. The UAS said in its 422/INVITE response that Min-SE >> is 5400, but then UAS sent SE 3600 in its 200/INVITE response. The >> symbian_ua/PJSIP doesn't like it when the 200/INVITE response contains >> Session-expires header with value less than Min-SE header in INVITE >> request, so BYE was sent. >> >> The faulty UA here is the UAS, take a look at RFC 4028 Section 9: >> === >> If the UAS wishes to accept the request, it copies the value of the >> Session-Expires header field from the request into the 2xx response. >> The UAS response MAY reduce its value but MUST NOT set it to a >> duration lower than the value in the Min-SE header field in the >> request, if it is present; >> === >> >> However, I've just created ticket #954 (Session Timer issues) and >> considered to put this case in. >> >> Thanks for the report, >> nanang >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Bharat >> Yadav<bharat.yadav at axisconvergence.com> wrote: >>> Dear Nanang >>> Here is trace logs of symbian_ua and Wireshark. >>> Thanks and regards >>> Bharat >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: pjsip-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org] >>> On Behalf Of Bharat Yadav >>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 5:10 PM >>> To: 'pjsip list' >>> Subject: Re: Session Timer Too Small >>> >>> Dear Nanang >>> Thanks for quick reply. First of all when I want to make call with G711 > it >>> will ok and call get connected and I hangup the call gracefully, but if I >>> only use G729 for that case when call made at the stage of Ringing if >>> recipient accept the call it shows "Session Timer Too small" and get > hanged >>> with "normal call clearing" message. From the log end with will send the > log >>> file within as while. >>> Thanks >>> Bharat >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: pjsip-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pjsip-bounces at lists.pjsip.org] >>> On Behalf Of Nanang Izzuddin >>> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:52 PM >>> To: pjsip list >>> Subject: Re: Session Timer Too Small >>> >>> Hi Bharat, >>> >>> I don't think I get this right. There shouldn't be a problem when a >>> caller gets 422 response (session timer too small), it will just >>> re-try to send INVITE with acceptable session interval as specified by >>> the 422 response automatically (no config setting to be set/modified >>> here). >>> >>> So, did you experience other than the above scenario? Log file or >>> clear reproducing steps could be helpful. >>> >>> Regards, >>> nanang >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Bharat >>> Yadav<bharat.yadav at axisconvergence.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> I am using 1.4 trunk and trying to implement VAS for FP1 using > symbian_ua >>>> all are fine for Ringing stage when call connect to GSM phone using G729 >>> it >>>> show "Session Timer Too Small", how should and where I define session > time >>>> into ua.cpp, I checked into pjsua_app.c but failed to follow steps for >>>> session timer expression. Please help. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Bharat >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >>>> >>>> pjsip mailing list >>>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >>>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >>> >>> pjsip mailing list >>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >>> >>> pjsip mailing list >>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >>> >>> pjsip mailing list >>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >
