OK, thanks for the quick answer. We are developing in Montreal an open-source softphone ( have a look on our website: http://www.sflphone.org ), based on pjsip for the SIP layer. The support of multiple accounts is the main reason we have been migrating to pjsip and we are very pleased of the result. By the way, did you think of packaging your library ? I'll probably be able to help you on that if you need it. It would be great to provide a rpm/debian packages on your website or to be integrated in the official repositories. Regards Manu Benny Prijono a ?crit : > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Emmanuel Milou > <emmanuel.milou at savoirfairelinux.com > <mailto:emmanuel.milou at savoirfairelinux.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > How can we handle the NAT/STUN matter when using multiple SIP > account ? > Is there a way to specify a STUN configuration per SIP account, so > that the same configuration could not be applied to every accounts? > > > Unfortunately we can't do that for now. This is another thing that > would need revamping, as things like TURN is much more logical to be > put as part of account specific settings and not global settings. My > hesitation is that this would break compatibility severely, so perhaps > we'll do this at some point in the future where it becomes more > acceptable. > > > Great library by the way . > > > Thanks. Hope we will not let you down. > > cheers > Benny > > > > Thanks, > > Manu > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org <mailto:pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >
