Benny Prijono schrieb: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Klaus > Darilion<klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Since 1.4 stun does not work anymore with vovida STUN server (damn old but >> very reliable). >> >> Wireshark reports 1.4 packets as "Session Traversal..." whereas 1.3 packets >> as "Simple Traversal....". >> >> Looks like you implemented a new specification? Is there somehow backwards >> compatibility? >> >> btw: can anybody recommend a STUN server which I can use instead? >> > > Ah, yes, good point! It was http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/866 > > Basically, in pre-1.4, STUN used to be one single point of failure > thing, if your STUN server is down the library will refuse to be > started. With that ticket, we added support for multiple STUN servers, > and the library checks for STUN server usability before picking one > up. The checking uses STUN facility in PJNATH, which is mostly new > STUN, though I thought it should be backward compatible with old STUN > (at least it worked with Vovida STUN in > http://www.sf.net/projects/stun) Hi Benny! pjsua_init blocks completely for 10 seconds if the STUN server does not respond - shouldn't that be non-blocking in case of stun_ignore_failure=TRUE regards klaus
