Hi Nanang, ? Got it, How about for Mac? Do you think Audio*framework, like AudioTool, AudioUnit, AudioQueue, etc, has advantage than PortAudio? ? Thanks --- On Thu, 10/16/08, Nanang Izzuddin <nanang at pjsip.org> wrote: From: Nanang Izzuddin <nanang@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: why portaudio To: wwzhdo at yahoo.com, "pjsip list" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 10:47 AM Hi, Some of the reasons could be: - PA works and tested a lot by many users. - PA is developed & maintained by experienced experts in the field, so why reinventing the wheel while there are many other things to be done. - PA offers friendly license. However, we are always open for contributions :) And FYI, on Windows platforms there are already alternative implementations (WMME & DirectSound), and on Symbian platforms (AudioStream and APS) there are only native implementations. Regards, nanang On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:13 AM, w zl <wwzhdo at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > PJSIP uses "PortAudio" to handle audio, I'm wondering why not use native > sound API for different platform, for example, for Mac, Audio*Frameword, on > windows, WIN32 or directsound, etc? > > Thanks! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20081016/c6a09c4d/attachment-0001.html>
