TCP Transport question...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's great Benny. Thanks!
bye, sasa

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote:

> On 3/21/08, Benny Prijono <bennylp at pjsip.org> wrote:
> >  >  > Nice!
> >  >
> >  > Yes. It's somehow funny, because there is more or less endless
> outbound
> >  >  discussion in the IETF but in fact with a smart SIP client it works
> >  >  since long time (at least with eyebeam and openser).
> >  >
> >
> >
> > Yeah. But fortunately for me, the client side of outbound is not too
> >  bad, looks pretty easy. But it may be quite hairy on the server side
> >  probably. But that TCP trick is smart indeed, I think I might have a
> >  go at that (we already have a similar trick for UDP to handle
> >  symmetric NAT).
>
> Right, just did in http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/515. So back to
> you Sasa, pjsua now should re-register with a correct Contact when you
> use TCP.
>
> Cheers,
>  Benny
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080324/372c588d/attachment.html 


[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux