TCP Transport question...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/21/08, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
>  >> There is also another approach (e.g. which is used by eyebeam/xlite). It
>  >>  sends a REGISTER with private IPs. In the response it evaluates the Via
>  >>  header and gets the public Ip:port from received and rport parameter.
>  >>  Then it deREGISTERs the public contact and reREGISTERs using the learnt
>  >>  IP address:port.
>  >
>  > Nice!
>
> Yes. It's somehow funny, because there is more or less endless outbound
>  discussion in the IETF but in fact with a smart SIP client it works
>  since long time (at least with eyebeam and openser).
>

Yeah. But fortunately for me, the client side of outbound is not too
bad, looks pretty easy. But it may be quite hairy on the server side
probably. But that TCP trick is smart indeed, I think I might have a
go at that (we already have a similar trick for UDP to handle
symmetric NAT).

Cheers
 Benny



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux