TCP Transport question...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/21/08, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
>  > Yep that's intentional. STUN, as it stands for, applies only to UDP
>  > transports. For TCP/TLS transport, the only way to get around NAT is
>  > to use SIP outbound draft, which I plan to implement in the next few
>  > weeks.
>
> There is also another approach (e.g. which is used by eyebeam/xlite). It
>  sends a REGISTER with private IPs. In the response it evaluates the Via
>  header and gets the public Ip:port from received and rport parameter.
>  Then it deREGISTERs the public contact and reREGISTERs using the learnt
>  IP address:port.

Nice!

Cheers,
 Benny



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux