On 3/21/08, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote: > > Yep that's intentional. STUN, as it stands for, applies only to UDP > > transports. For TCP/TLS transport, the only way to get around NAT is > > to use SIP outbound draft, which I plan to implement in the next few > > weeks. > > There is also another approach (e.g. which is used by eyebeam/xlite). It > sends a REGISTER with private IPs. In the response it evaluates the Via > header and gets the public Ip:port from received and rport parameter. > Then it deREGISTERs the public contact and reREGISTERs using the learnt > IP address:port. Nice! Cheers, Benny
