On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Pedro Gon?alves <pedro.pandre at gmail.com> wrote: > I've searched in the whole PJSIP solution and the only place where > PJSIP_SC_BUSY_HERE is being used is in sip_replaces.c, in method > *pjsip_replaces_verify_request*. > However, I am not using that method in any part of my code, it is only being > called in pjsua_call.c (pjsua_call_on_incoming). > I have also checked the re-INVITE and it does not have any replaces header. > > Then I searched my whole solution for "486", "Busy" and so on, and found no > evidence of direct 486 answer to INVITEs. > > Are you know the PJSIP code far better than I do, are you sure there is no > module besides PJSIP which answers with 486? > Nope. The pjsua-lib might emit this, but then again you are not using it. So in this case it's your proxy then that answers with 486. Probably something wrong with your re-INVITE, which makes the proxy thinks it's a fresh INVITE rather than a re-INVITE. -benny
