On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Tzury Bar Yochay <tzury.by at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > FYI PocketPJ is the new (and better) app sample for WM > > I was not aware of its existence. > However, I've tried it and the symptoms are pretty much the same - > codec PCMU, echo, "silence" noise (which seems to be generated by the > echo suppressor) > > The improvements are on the UI. The core are the same of course. But at least with PocketPJ most settings (including EC) can be turn on/off during run-time so it'll speed up troubleshooting. > > > > > I manage to make a phone between the O2 and the PC, however the quality > is > > > very poor, with echo and disruptions of the voice. > > > > > > > This probably is a known problem. We use echo suppressor on WM and it's > > performance is quite poor. If anyone can suggest better alternatives then > > that will be great. > > Yeah, I've noticed that the echo suppressor is quite poor. Will speex > make things better, or it's a completely different issue? > > Dunno if it'll make it better, but I think it requires too much processing for WM devices so we can't use that. Although I haven't experimented too much to find out if this indeed is the case. > > > > > Did you put/enable Speex in the build? > > > on the WM side I didn't change anything this round - so I guess it is > included there by default. > on the Desktop side speex is there (seeing it by typing Cp) > > Is there another way to confirm they both have it? > do I need to specify something in the PocketPJ build? > > Frankly I forgot if it's enabled by default (IIRC it should in PocketPJ). You can just check the source and your config_site.h, or see in Wireshark (or "PocketPJ.TXT" log file in root device directory) if Speex is offered to know if it's included in the build. -benny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080805/6708af97/attachment.html
