Paweł This seems like a potentially useful workaround (like your strings suggestion). I would expect for SoapServer to either work as expected or have its limitations documented, with suggested workarounds. In any case, I really appreciate the help. Regards, Bruce > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:34:21 +0100 > From: bkrupa@proton.eu.org > To: bruce1828@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: SoapServer and integer types question > > the other solution is to divide one huge integer into two ones. > X=2^32*A+B > in this way you can pass 64 bit integer using two 32 bit ones. > > The real problem is not in soap server or client as you may > easily pass strings instead of integers, but in > managing huge integers in your code. > > You can use GMP for integers of any length arithmetics. > > take care, > > pk > > > Bruce Bailey pisze: > > Thanks all for your replies. According to my limited understanding of schemas, xs:long types would need 64 bits to represent. However, SoapServer doesn't seem to recognize that. Wouldn't that be considered a defect? Should I enter a defect here? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bruce > > > > > >> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:18:09 +0100 > >> From: bkrupa@proton.eu.org > >> To: bruce1828@hotmail.com > >> Subject: Re: SoapServer and integer types question > >> > >> just string ;) > >> > >> Bruce Bailey pisze: > >> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I'm using the SoapServer class (in PHP5.2.3) and noticing what seems like incorrect behavior. > >>> > >>> When I have 10 digit (or greater) integer values returned from the SoapServer, they seem to overflow. > >>> > >>> For example: > >>> > >>> Schema type (from WSDL): xs:long (or xs:int or xs:integer) > >>> Returned value (from network trace): <value>2147483647</value> > >>> > >>> Expected value: <value>3605736641</value> > >>> > >>> > >>> Is this correct behavior? > >>> > >>> I find that if I use xs:decimal for the type, I get my expected value back from SoapServer, but I'm concerned that there are unexpected consequences waiting for me in the future. > >>> > >>> What have other people done in this type of situation? > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance, > >>> > >>> Bruce > >>> > >>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. > >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390710/direct/01/ > >>> > >>> > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/ > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390706/direct/01/
