2014/1/7 Lin Yo-an <cornelius.howl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> 2014/1/7 Lin Yo-An <cornelius.howl@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I can provide a router, that is even faster:
>
> $routes = [
> '/hello' => ['foo', 'bar']
> ];
>
> if (isset($routes['/hello']) {
> do_something($routes['/hello']);
> }
>
>
> I couldn't resist :)
>
>
> Of course you can do that. I can’t stop you.
>
> but your route only works for very simple case.
>
> Pux can do more complex pattern routing just like Symfony/Routing.
>
Thats what I wanted to tell you: You benchmark a single, very trivial case.
For this case (as mentioned) I don't need a router at all, but thats not
the point of a router. Of course both implementations can do more and thats
what most interest: How do they behave in something similar to "real world"
scenarios :)
>
> If you’ve read the readme file carefully, you should have knew that Pux
> can let you define path requirement and default value very easily, so you
> don’t need to write complex patterns by hands.
>
> for example, the Pux pattern compiler support the slug & requirement
> feature just like Symfony/Routing, but Pux provides a better performance.
>
Something veeery different: How easy is it to replace Symfony2s router with
your one? If I use the Symfony2-Router, it is probably not, because it
looks nice, but I use it within something Symfony-HTTP-Kernel based. So
even if you one is much much faster, maybe it doesn't help me?
I can imagine, that it is quite easy to implement a Symfony2-Router-class,
that just pass-through the request to your implementation. A benchmark
about this would be interesting too: How much is the speedup in my
_existing_ application simply by _replacing_ (and not rewriting too much)
the router?
>
> http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#addiAnd saying this mine
> is probably fang-requirements<http://symfony.com/doc/current/book/routing.html#adding-requirements>
>
>
>
> The example below is copied from the README.
>
> use Pux\Executor;
>
> class ProductController {
> public function listAction() {
> return 'product list';
> }
> public function itemAction($id) {
> return "product $id";
> }
> }
> $mux = new Pux\Mux;
> $mux->add('/product', ['ProductController','listAction']);
> $mux->add('/product/:id', ['ProductController','itemAction'] , [
> 'require' => [ 'id' => '\d+', ],
> 'default' => [ 'id' => '1', ]
> ]);
> $route = $mux->dispatch('/product/1');
> Executor::execute($route);
>
>
> And here comes the example from Symfony/Routing:
>
> use Symfony\Component\Routing\RouteCollection;use Symfony\Component\Routing\Route;
> $collection = new RouteCollection();$collection->add('blog', new Route('/blog/{page}', array(
> '_controller' => 'AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index',
> 'page' => 1,), array(
> 'page' => '\d+',)));
> return $collection;
>
>
>
>
>
> Also (don't know, what others think) I'd only compare the matching, not
> the setup. Especially because once you use a form of serialized object and
> for the other you set it up programmatically ;)
>
>
> it’s not testing setup. if you've checked the dispatch test case (L40-L50
> in https://github.com/c9s/router-benchmark/blob/master/code/dispatch.php)
>
> it only calls the dispatch method in the iteration block.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Lester Caine <lester@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Stuart Dallas wrote:
>> >
>> >> Tedd Sperling wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> >>This reminds me of an oversea's client I had where they wanted to
>> >>>> enter the American market with their Pet Shampoo. I told them they
>> may want
>> >>>> to pick a different domain name, but they insisted that they had
>> properly
>> >>>> investigated the market and had made their choice of "smellypet.com
>> ".
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>A year later, they contacted me and said they finally understood
>> what
>> >>>> I was talking about.
>> >>>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >FCKEditor is another higher profile example …
>> >>>
>> >>
>> http://docs.cksource.com/FCKeditor_3.x/Design_and_Architecture/Rebranding
>> >>
>> >
>> > A good documentation of the problem explaining why what seems like a bit
>> > of a joke can backfire?
>> >
>> > I'm of an age where the Windows DDK came on a stack of floppy disks. It
>> > was quite irritating to read some of the jokes and fowl language that
>> were
>> > spread through the code. Something that would not be allowed these days
>> as
>> > we can all review the code bases. Care in the choice of names is even
>> more
>> > important these days?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lester Caine - G8HFL
>> > -----------------------------
>> > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
>> > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
>> > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
>> > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
>> >
>> > Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>> >
>> > --
>> > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Yo-An Lin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> github.com/KingCrunch
>
>
>
--
github.com/KingCrunch
