On 21 May 2011 18:42, Stuart Dallas <stuart@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Peter Lind <peter.e.lind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 21 May 2011 18:26, Stuart Dallas <stuart@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> *snip* >> >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_programming >> > You do things your way and I'll do things my way. Best of luck to you. >> >> Thank you for your condescending tone. Best of luck to you too. > > It is regrettable if you took offence, but I stand by my tone. I've cleaned > up too many messes over the years that were caused by careless (and in some > cases incompetent) assumptions that I have little time for anyone who > doesn't see the value in expecting the unexpected. Yet you assume that I have no experience, have never cleaned up messes after others, and generally have no clue what I'm talking about. At no point did I state that I see no value in expecting the unexpected or that I disagree with defensive programming. What I did state is that I prefer clearing up any unclear areas and remove assumptions - if I end up spending most of my time doing defensive programming because I haven't cleared up the specifications with the client, then I have done a very poor job. Anyway, I doubt there's much point in continuing the conversation - you seem to have a set worldview and it appears that my role in it is the same regardless of what I state from here on out. So: best of luck to you. Regards Peter -- <hype> WWW: plphp.dk / plind.dk LinkedIn: plind BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51 Twitter: kafe15 </hype> -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
