On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:52 PM, tedd <tedd.sperling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 11:37 AM -0600 2/15/11, Nicholas Kell wrote: >> >> On Feb 15, 2011, at 10:51 AM, tedd wrote: >> > At 8:26 PM -0500 2/14/11, Brian Waters wrote: >> >> (if that's OK). I know that PHP sometimes has a reputation for having >> >> (some) lousy developers, and I'd like to avoid becoming one of those >> > >> > We don't agree that PHP has a reputation of having some lousy >> developers -- because that's simply not true. >> >> Humm.... I seem to agree with the OP. But, that being said, unlike most >> language fanboys PHP'ers usually fully admit it. > > > I guess that we run in different worlds. Most of the PHP programmers I know > are very good. I didn't mean to suggest anything. Nor do I necessarily subscribe to the idea (that PHP has some lousy developers). It's just something I've heard bouncing around - probably on those noisy internet forums. - BW P.S: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:51 AM, tedd <tedd.sperling@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > PS: We seldom point out spelling errors, but it's good to review what you > post. Remember, what you post will be public for generations to come. I'm aware that I misspelled "viciously" in my original post but was too lazy to rectify the situation. P.P.S, Apologies for backchanneling tedd there; I'm used to mailing lists with a default Reply-To: the@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx header. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
