On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:16:04AM +0200, Peter Lind wrote:
> On 12 May 2010 07:10, Kevin Kinsey <kdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:48 +0530, chetan rane wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> mod rewrite was actually inrduced to have search engne frendly urls.
> >>> hnce if you want a seo site then you have to use options 1 & 2. using
> >>> smarty or any templating engine for readibility is not total true.
> >>> one of the major advantages of using template engines is caching
> >>>
> >
> > I've read some {disparaging?) comments on "option 2", but I've
> > got a question, or point, about that. I'm not at all sure that
> > you have to use "mod_rewrite" at all, can't you just use a
> > FORCETYPE directive on your handler script(s)?
> >
> > I've certainly got some work in the form:
> >
> > somesite.com/scriptname/var1/var2/var3
> >
> > that seems to work well with no use of the rewrite module.
> >
>
> And why wouldn't you want to use mod_rewrite? It's an extremely
> powerful tool that does the job really well.
Because your public internet server disables its use.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
