On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 16:12, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/4/21 David McGlone <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote: >>> On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by >>> > multiple e-mail lists? >>> > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of >>> > users just to satisfy a couple of few. >>> >>> David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty >>> sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the >>> reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one >>> needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to >>> the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam >>> people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the >>> OP AND the list). >> >> Exactly. I also feel bad for those who have to pay to download per Mb, >> GB, etc. >> >> It's pitiful that once I send this E-Mail, Peter and Hans both will get >> 2 of the exact messages. >> > > Strange I only got one, but it ma be a mail server filter I'll have to say that I've never received duplicate messages on any of the nine PHP.net mailing lists I'm subscribed to either. -- Daniel Egeberg -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
