On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:12 +0200, Hans Åhlin wrote: > 2010/4/21 David McGlone <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:49 +0200, Peter Lind wrote: > >> On 21 April 2010 14:38, Hans Åhlin <ahlin.hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Why change the way that has been around for years and adopted by > >> > multiple e-mail lists? > >> > It feels like it's more problem to change the way for thousands of > >> > users just to satisfy a couple of few. > >> > >> David was venting based on a discussion in another thread. I'm pretty > >> sure he knows about the option to reply-all - that's part of the > >> reason for venting (it sends multiple emails instead of just the one > >> needed). The optimal scenario is to: 1) be able to quickly respond to > >> the list, as that's the normal action you want to do and 2) not spam > >> people with several emails for no reason (i.e. avoid replying to the > >> OP AND the list). > > > > Exactly. I also feel bad for those who have to pay to download per Mb, > > GB, etc. > > > > It's pitiful that once I send this E-Mail, Peter and Hans both will get > > 2 of the exact messages. > > > > Strange I only got one, but it ma be a mail server filter I just received 3 copies of this message. One went to my PHP folder and 2 went to my Inbox. -- Blessings, David M. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
