On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tommy Pham wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Tommy Pham wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Tommy Pham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What I find funny is that one of opponents of PHP threads earlier >>>>>> mentioned that how silly it would be to be using C in a web app. >>>>>> Now I hear people mentioning C when they need "productivity" or >>>>>> "speed"... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think I was the one to mention the latter, but as I started out >>>>> saying, and as others have said too, it's about the right tool for >>>>> the right job. When choosing a tool, there are a number of factors >>>>> to consider - developer productivity, available skills, future >>>>> maintenance, performance, scalability, portability, parallelism, >>>>> performance etcetera. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Funny you should mention all that. Let's say that you're longer >>>> with that company, either by direct employment or contract >>>> consultant. You've implemented C because you need 'thread'. Now >>>> your replacement comes in and has no clue about C even though your >>>> replacement is a PHP guru. How much headache is maintenance gonna >>>> be? Scalability? Portability? wow.... >>> >>> Who was the idi... who hired someone who wasn't suited for the job? >>> Tommy, that's a moot argument. You can't fit a square peg in a round >>> hole. >>> >>> -- >>> Per Jessen, Zürich (12.5°C) >>> >> >> Suited for the job? You mean introduce more complexity to a problem >> that what could be avoided to begin with if PHP has thread support? >> hmmm.... > > Tommy, it's perfectly simple: in my company we hire people with C > skills for C programming jobs. We hire people with database skills to > be database administrators. We hire people with Linux skills to work > on Linux systems. We explicitly do _not_ hire PHP web-programmers to > maintain our C code. And vice versa for that matter. No problem, no > complexity. > > > -- > Per Jessen, Zürich (13.4°C) > > That may just work out fine if you work directly for the company with all the proper staffing. But some of us work as consultants or for companies without the proper staffing. As such, let's dissect what you mentioned: 1) PHP with internal thread support 2) PHP with external C/C++ thread support * Performance - having external thread support, now you have to call an extension (more memory usage and CPU cycles). If you happen to have a C/C++ guru who can then code that thread support into PHP extension, wouldn't it still perform better at the core vs as an extension because it's not talking to a 'middle man'? Having said that, not everyone has access to a C/C++ guru. Thus not mass availability. * Portability - if you're currently running PHP on Windows, but manage to convince management to switch to *BSD/Linux, then you'd have to rewrite that external thread support. But for us consultants, we may have 1 project the runs on Windows, the next may be *BSD/Linux. PHP code snippets goes a lot further versus your custom work around. * Managability - should your need to upgrade PHP for either bug fix, new features you'd want to implement to add more functionality to your site, will that then break your custom external solution? How much more manageable is it if it's done under 1 language versus 2+? Regards, Tommy -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
