Re: Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 13:24 -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:

> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: tedd <tedd.sperling@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Daevid Vincent <daevid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed, October 7, 2009 12:42:41 PM
> Subject: RE:  Whacky increment/assignment logic with $foo++ vs ++$foo
> 
> At 1:59 PM +0100 10/7/09, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> >>On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 08:54 -0400, tedd wrote:
> >>At 6:15 PM -0700 10/6/09, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> >>>Except that:
> >>>
> >>>$a = 123;
> >>>$b = $a++;
> >>>echo $b;  //gives 123, not 124
> >>>
> >>>as you logically expect it to and common sense would dictate, regardless of
> >>>what K&R or anyone else says.
> >>
> >>That's not the way I look at it.
> >>
> >>     $b = $a++;
> >>
> >>means to me "take the value of $a and assign to $b and then increment $a."
> >>
> >>Whereas:
> >>
> >>     $b = ++$a;
> >>
> >>means to me "increment $a and take the value of $a and assign to $b."
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>tedd
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Which is exactly the reason for the two operators in C.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ash
> 
> Ash:
> 
> The reason was simply to provide a different way of doing something. 
> For example, take the statements of:
> 
> $a = 10;
> $b = a$++;  // $b = 10 and $a = 11
> 
> This post-increment operator was a way to assign 10 to $b and 
> increment $a in one statement.
> 
> Whereas:
> 
> $a = 10;
> $b = ++a$;    // $b = 11 and $a = 11
> 
> This pre-increment operator was a way to increment $a and also assign 
> that value to $b.
> 
> Both are perfectly valid ways of using the operator. Also realize 
> that the pre-decrement and post-decrement operators worked in similar 
> fashion.
> 
> Now why would someone want to do that? There could be many reasons, 
> but that was left to the programmer to use as he/she needed.
> 
> However, what I find wacky about all of this is:
> 
>    for($i=1; $i<=10; $i++)
>      {
>      echo($i);
>      }
> 
> and
> 
>     for($i=1; $i<=10; ++$i)
>      {
>      echo($i);
>      }
> 
> 
> Do exactly the same thing. I would have expected the first to print 
> 1-10, while the second to print 2-10, but they both print 1-10.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> tedd
> 
> 
> Tommy>> Why would expect to print 2-10?  The way I read the for loop is:  start $i with 1, do loop body until $i <= 10, increment $i  before next loop.  So whether post/pre-increment doesn't matter logically.  Moreover,  your loop can also be written as:
> 
> for ($i=1; $i <= 10;)
> {
> echo ($i++);
> }
> 
> PS:  I hate to send reply in 'rich text' but Yahoo's plain text screw up the quote...  I think it's time to switch over to gmail...
> 
> 
> -- 
> -------
> http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
> 
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


That what I thought I said when I said "Which is exactly the reason for
the two operators in C."

Thanks,
Ash
http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk



[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux