On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 09:41 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 4:39 PM -0400 5/12/09, Robert Cummings wrote: > >On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 16:31 -0400, tedd wrote: > > > > > While your post dealt with [2] mine was addressing [1]. Understand? > > > >Except he already had that part working. He wanted to get the outline. > >You would know that if you read the full post since he gave a link to > >what he already had using PHP. When he says: > > > > "That site is also coded in php so I'm guessing that the > > watermark is added using a php technology." > > > >It means that he can presumably also generate a watermark with an > >outline using PHP and GD. > > Yeah, but that's only true if you read the post in detail. Look, I > always skim what the poster said and then answer as I think he may > want. Don't brother me with the details. > > That practice has worked for me for years without any problems > whatsoever and now you come along and want me to read and understand > everything in detail -- that ain't fair. Next thing you'll want is > for me to be right all the time like you are. :-) In the interest of increasing my rightness ratio, I'd just like to point out that I'm not always right :) > >Comprendez vous? > > Didn't they go out of business? Wasn't that Comprenez Vous? *tee hee* Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php