On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jason Pruim <japruim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Kyle Terry wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Shawn McKenzie <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >wrote: > > Kyle Terry wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Eric Butera wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown <danbrown@xxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle > > <edmund.hertle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up > > SVN, > > webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by > > 4-5 > > people. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. But > > if > > > there > > are quite enough people interested, it would be indeed a good idea > > to > > > start > > some other kind of communication... > > I flat-out disagree with this, Ed. Nothing at all against you, > though. > > This is the General list for PHP, and while this project is > PHP-related (and "general" in nature), if we allow even the > > "regulars" > > to do so here, how can we then tell others that we won't allow them > > to > > discuss their PHP-related projects on this list? > > Putting the code on a proper system to begin with means no > screwing around later when the project is running at full steam. > And even if there are only four or five people working on it, if > > those > > folks put in a good effort, they can work wonders. > > -- > </Daniel P. Brown> > daniel.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx || danbrown@xxxxxxx > http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ > Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print - email me to > > find > > out! > > I work on a development team of 3; me and 2 others. 1 of which only > > develops > about a quarter of his time here. Even with my co worker sitting next > > to > > me, > if we weren't using a repo, we would both be at a complete loss (right > word?). > > -- > Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com > > > I have been using svn for 3 years by myself. Recently I talked my > other co workers to play with it and they love it. But even in an > army of one it's amazing to be able to figure out what I messed up > last week or why I decided to change something at 5:00. People have > wrote books on it though, so I'll hush. > > still up :p > > dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any > extra needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows > discussion and document storage made website available] > svn - a must imho > > consideration: > been thinking 2 things > 1 - this could be a lot of noise on the list; perhaps an approach of rfc > and publish every idea, post link to it here so anybody can contribute, > > then > > go from there. > discuss [ wiki needed? ] > > > wiki will definitely be needed. > > 2 - actually that was both in one sentance > > maybe first rfc should be "super class for all xxxx (our) objects" and > > if > > so what > > + a name, cos if we need to start prefixing.. and it can't be 4LC as > > can't > > start with a number :p > > > The world's object? > > > this will be massively interesting.. > > > > > Given "Common Objects and Datatypes", has anyone proposed "COD Pieces"? > > -- > Thanks! > -Shawn > http://www.spidean.com > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > Project COD: For the World, By the World. > > > Would version 2 then be called CODE "Common Objects and Datatypes > Enhanced"? > > > -- > Jason Pruim > japruim@xxxxxxxxxx > 616.399.2355 > > > > Perfect! -- Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com
