Re: maybe we could all?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kyle Terry wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric Butera wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle <
>>>>> edmund.hertle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham <nrixham@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces
>>>>>>> and abstracts, then implementations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested
>>>>>>> parties?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if so important things like is this discussed on this list or where,
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> for server space and svn? etc scope for a user group / list @ php on
>>>>>>> this?
>>>>>>> or what..?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + all monkeys no organ grinder approach, no release until all happy
>>>>>>> (negating obvious trouble makers) and maybe a release manager for
>>>>>>> svn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> more thoughts please
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
>>>>>> webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
>>>>>> people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I use Comcast and they put a 250gig cap per month of their
>>>>> residential
>>>>> customer, so my server can only be used temporarily if we need one.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Guys there's plenty of free "open source" hosted svn/git servers.  Do
>>>> a google search.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user
>>> base
>>> and integrated promotion "most active" - possibly with aid of tony :D
>>>
>>>
>> http://gitorious.org/
>>
>
> open to debate; my preference for now goes to sourceforge as it's all there
> including space with php support; proven you know. However i like new
> projects as well so open but overall +1 goes to whatever gets us up and
> running with the least time spent.
>
> and on the other side.. to open things up
>
> interface Object {
> }
>
> or
>
> abstract class Object {
> }
>
> or
>
> class Object {
> }
>
> nothing else for now:
>
> reason:
> to address the current and forseable lack of function(object $obj) in php;
> in addition to allow future scope for any common to all methods (or any
> implementation of this to have)
>
> i guess first is it a good idea to have any of the above and to address
> this, then next if so which?
>

That needs to be prefixed.  Or maybe namespaces if you're targeting
5.3?  It'd suck to have a lot of code using such a thing only to
become a reserved word.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux