Re: Zend Framework...where to start? -- don't.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:39:02PM -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:

>    Not to start a Holy War (as these "to framework" or "not to framework"
>    debates often turn into), but I personally had a horrible experience with
>    using frameworks. I was forced to use Symfony at my last job and it was so
>    cumbersome and slow to do even the simplest things. The whole MVC thing
>    can be overkill. Plus the learning curve can be quite steep. Then if you
>    want to hire other developers to work with you, you have to train them and
>    let them ramp up on not only the framework but also your core project too!
>    More wasted time.
> 
>    The pages are significantly slower than straight PHP by orders of
>    magnitude: [1]http://paul-m-jones.com/?p=315

What a great link! I've never seen this kind of comparison before. HTML
is 70% faster than straight PHP, and the frameworks (even codeigniter)
deliver less than 20% of the performance of straight PHP.

> 
>    The basic problem with frameworks is they try to be one thing for all
>    people. This carries a lot of baggage with it. There's a lot of crap you
>    end up pulling in that you don't want/need. Plus if you want to deviate at
>    all, you either have to roll your own, or sometimes you simply just can't.
>    They seem attractive with all their plugins and stuff, but honestly,
>    rarely do the plugins do EXACTLY what you want, the way you want. It might
>    be as simple as trying to change the look/feel of a button or something
>    and you'll find out that you can't -- so now you have this website that
>    has this section that doesn't look like the rest of your site. And if you
>    find a bug, you have to try to either fix it yourself and then keep those
>    changes migrated into new updates, or submit it to the developer and hope
>    they implement them (and trust me, you can submit to them and have them
>    rejected for all sorts of lame reasons -- even though the work has been
>    done and you're using it!)
> 
>    I advise against it. Just follow good practices and use thin wrappers and
>    functions. Don't get all OO googlie eyed and try to over-engineer and
>    over-OO the code. OO is great for some things (like a User class) but
>    don't start making some OO page renderer or form builder. Don't fall into
>    the DB Abstraction trap either -- just use a wrapper around your DB calls
>    (see attached), so you can swap out that wrapper if (and you almost never
>    do) you change the DB. Don't be suckered by something like QuickForms --
>    you WILL run into limitations that you can't get around and are at their
>    mercy. Don't buy the hype that DIV's are the magic bullet and TABLEs are
>    "poor design" -- Tables are still the best and most ubiquitous way to
>    align things in a browser agnostic way (including mobile phones, etc.) and
>    to layout forms.

I agree and disagree. I agree there's waaay too much herd mentality in
the programming field. (Fortunately, Linus Torvalds didn't listen to the
academics who insisted that microkernels where THE WAY, or we wouldn't
have Linux today.) OO is nifty for some things, but it's certainly not
the "fountain of reusability" it was originally promoted to be. And I
also agree about tables versus CSS. I can render a page very precisely
with tables that would take me hours to get right with CSS. And I really
don't give a crap about what "experts" say about anything. I find
"experts" to be wrong much of the time.

OTOH, I just finished writing about 80K lines of PHP/HTML, all by hand,
no OO, no classes, no nothing. Each page in one file, except for a few
helper functions in a couple of common files. I wouldn't want to go
through that again. I've opted for a framework on rewriting this code,
just to cut down on the number of lines of code I have to manually
write. But I built my own framework, which doesn't call in 20 files for
each page load. Very compact. Probably not suitable for every kind of
project, but it works for this.

Incidentally, I would differ from the reviewer in the link above only in
this respect: He maintains that every line of code adds time. While this
is true, I believe it's the number of files which have to be opened
which drags down framework numbers the most. When I wrote C code, the
CPU would blaze through the actual code, but file opens and reads
consumed far more time than in-memory code execution.

Paul
-- 
Paul M. Foster

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux