Skip Evans wrote: >I used Kate on Ubuntu for a code editor. I just read through a bit about >Geany (was not familiar with it), but don't see too much more it would >do for me than Kate. > >What are some of your favorite features of Geany I should be aware of? There's probably not much that Geany does that Kate doesn't, to be frank (other than run on Windows too). OTOH, there are many things that Kate does that Geany doesn't. However, being built on GTK, Geany is a little quicker, especially now that Kate's gone all KDE4. Certainly, when I was running on a P-III @ 666MHz, Kate was frustratingly sluggish while Geany was very quick and responsive. Thinking about it now, that's probably why I picked Geany over the other options at the time. John Corry wrote: >Kate for PHP development? That sounds really slow and inefficient. >Eclipse and Zend studio offer such efficiencies as code >completion/hints (PHP core or any other included classes/files), code >explorer views/trees, SVN/CVS support, debugging...very capable IDEs. Geany has basic code completion hints for built-in functions, and file-by-file code explorer views but not a project-wide code explorer. For me, feature-rich IDEs mean more stuff I need to remember and fight with, and that's a problem these daze. I do a fair bit from the shell, including most SVN ops. Small and fast, with snippets, and regex search and replace, is pretty much all I need. Except when debugging (for which I've been using NetBeans). Hmmm... must do something about that some day. -- Ross McKay, Toronto, NSW Australia "Let the laddie play wi the knife - he'll learn" - The Wee Book of Calvin -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php