On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 19:46 +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Robert Cummings wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 19:18 +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote: > > > >> Daniel Brown wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 13:34, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> He didn't say it had no insecurities... he said it's hard to believe > >>>> it's "JUST AS insecure". Please provide factual sources to indicate the > >>>> validity of your statement. > >>>> > >>> Counter: please provide factual sources that it's not, whilst > >>> keeping in mind the statements made elsewhere in this thread. > >>> > >>> > >> if it's a computer thats on, with an os, a keyboard and a network card > >> connected to the internet it's insecure. > >> > > > > We're not debating whether it is or is not insecure... we're debating > > comparitive insecurity in relation to that of Windows. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob. > > > that's my point, all OS's are equally insecure, the only thing debatable > is which os has more people trying to exploit those insecurities (and > the answer is obviously windows) Equally? Have you looked in a dictionary to see what the word "equal" means? Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
