Greetings, "Richard Heyes". In reply to Your message dated Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 18:34:27, > In looking at the manual regarding tagging, it seems an awful chore > compared to CVS. It only seems. In fact, the "copy" command only creating a reference to the specific revision. So, nothing, at all, being duplicated in reality. I too was disoriented a bit in the same place, but, to make it clear, SVN based mostly on structure organisation, than on added features. In this situation, CVS's "tagging" is a feature, while SVN "tagging" by referencing your revision in /tags/ branch is a way to organise your work. > Is this the generally held belief or do I need to go > back and re-read? Just read further while you keeping confusing moments in mind. At some point, they will become clearer... eventually. -- Sincerely Yours, ANR Daemon <anrdaemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
