On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Eric Butera <eric.butera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Nathan Nobbe <quickshiftin@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Bojan Tesanovic <btesanovic@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > > in PHP5 by default Objects are passed by reference and as you can see > at > > > this graph passing array by reference in PHP5 is slower > > > http://nathan.moxune.com/arrayVsArrayIteratorReport.php > > > > > > wow, thats hilarious, thats my own chart :O ROTFL > > > > im glad somebody else thought something of it ;) > > > > -nathan > > > > I almost spit my water out when I saw that link directed at you. good times! > Your > work is famous! ;) well i do what i can :D I don't have an actual answer as far as benchmarks go. I've been > converting all of my sites from php4 to 5 over the past 3 months > stripping out &'s as I go. I haven't noticed any differences myself > though. But then again I've been adding in type hints and visibility > too so I'm sure that isn't helping. yea; i hadnt thought of the overhead of adding visibility / type hinting in. but if im adding those, either way; the extra cost from the & can be gained back if theyre yanked. I'm always pimping Xdebug, so just remember it will show you where > your real bottlenecks are instead of guessing. *shrug* xdebug is da bomb; thats what i used to build the charts from the performance report ;) ok, so heres what im thinking. any functions that return by reference can safely be changed, right? so i could do a mass replace like this find: 'function &' replace: 'function ' note, there is a space after function in the replace. i think the only reason to use return by reference is when returning an object to avoid getting a copy back in the php4 days. the rest im thinking can be done by hand as time goes on. waddya all think? thx, -nathan
