Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
hi stut,
thank you for your advices.
Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still,
since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to
enjoy myself...
- Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
language.
Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave
the text on the page a name, how twee.
- The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
like ?param1=XYZ¶m2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
content links.
Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards
compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with
are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker
and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation.
You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a
lot like a CMS and not a framework.
- Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
resting for the viewers on a page.
Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even
slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using
some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous
patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.
Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
during the runtime of the application.
Sold!!
I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
for performing psychological operations over the internet.
I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
now a days.
I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how
ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
- As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is
derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting
primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological
order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for
specific page elements to be present.
- The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
as what ever you could think of.
Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your
website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
as a nonquery url, like:
http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/something-new/while-i-wrote-it-here.html
Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not
really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
Done without mod_rewrite.
Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is
this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be
interested to know which you are using and what you have against
mod_rewrite.
> I hope I answered all your questions.
That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
> Best Regards,
Yours sarcastically,
-Stut
Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
3) Make sure it's in English
4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the
product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works,
especially when it says it's powered by your product!
Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
* What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
* What the heck are "Screentexts"?
* As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding
URLs. Do you have a reference?
* Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to
do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because
what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you
could well be!
* "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
* "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of
mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
* It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
-Stut
