Re: Public Announcement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stut,

if you check out http://getvanilla.com/ this is a forum
software which uses mod_rewrite to show everything in fine
ass written urls, like my system does allready in a better
way.

As I know from the google indexing threads running over my
websites, the robot indexes all pathes as long there are
found contents.

If you have a query like
http://www.domain.com/en/folder1/folder2/document-name.html

and the application shows contents over this url:

http://www.domain.com/index.php?lang=en&pid=XYZ

while document XYZ belongs to category automobiles and
is a BMX Nissan

If now the search robot is comming is crawling the

http://www.domain.com/ finds a hole bunch of links to

/en/automobiles/bmx-nissan/XYZ.html

decides to look into /en/ first, and figures out, here
there is absolutely nothing in it.

The same thing happens to the /en/automobiles/ folder
till it at the late end reaches the document-name.html

So the indexing provider decides, that these categories
are only getting missused to point out informations which
are not really there. So its a fraud.

I could advertise pictures off dolly buster to all people
searching for BMX-Nissan.

While when the indexing service comes and I call the document
bmx-nissan.html and on the site only is to read dolly buster
has a dot on her ass, the website will sink in the respect of
the search engine.

I hope you understood what I said.

My websites are working in a slightly different way. I am creating
overview pages in every category which says, I have an overview
page showing all car brands in automobile, in the BMX-Nissan sektion
there is an overview page over all BMX-Nissan Cars which are pointing
out to one of the XYZ's

Yes, Stut you are right you could see it as a front controller pattern,
while it actually is reappearing in any folder shown on my websites.

Its great to talk to you stut :)

Best Regards,

Sascha





Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> > The pages are all delivered by one single kind of page parser.
> > 
> > Its consisting of round about 5 lines of code. But for different
> > reasons there have to get written parsers, especially for the
> > content to show. The longest parser is consisting of 11 lines
> > of code.
> > 
> > But I don't want to say more, otherwise my invention is not mine
> > anymore. Me alone as a developer can't react fast enough, to ar-
> > chive the success, I normaly ought to have, before everybody is
> > running to archive the same innovations like me.
> 
> This is not your invention so I'm not sure what you think you're 
> protecting. It's known as the Front Controller pattern and is widely 
> used with and without a query string in both PHP and many other 
> languages. It can also require changes to the web server environment to 
> make it work. Google for "front controller pattern" for more information.
> 
> You didn't say what you have against mod_rewrite. I'll bet you 
> mod_rewrite can parse a request and send it to the right script faster 
> than your PHP implementation.
> 
> > But as I can see how you are reacting on it, and others as well
> > everybody is really loves the behavior. Its long time ago that
> > I spoke with other devs. So I really feel well about the conver-
> > sation.
> 
> You're not quite catching on to my opinion of your "product", but I'm 
> glad you "feel well about the conversation".
> 
> > Thank you very much.
> 
> You're quite welcome.
> 
> -Stut
> 
> > Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> >> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote:
> >>> hi stut,
> >>>
> >>> thank you for your advices.
> >> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still, 
> >> since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to 
> >> enjoy myself...
> >>
> >>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions
> >>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one
> >>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they'
> >>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different
> >>> language.
> >> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave 
> >> the text on the page a name, how twee.
> >>
> >>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's
> >>> like ?param1=XYZ&param2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING']
> >>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid
> >>> content links.
> >> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards 
> >> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with 
> >> are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation.
> >>
> >>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my
> >>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used
> >>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on.
> >> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker 
> >> and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker.
> >>
> >>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you
> >>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore.
> >>>
> >>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have
> >>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my-
> >>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on.
> >> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation. 
> >> You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a 
> >> lot like a CMS and not a framework.
> >>
> >>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide
> >>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality
> >>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte-
> >>> resting for the viewers on a page.
> >> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even 
> >> slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using 
> >> some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous 
> >> patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly.
> >>
> >>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts
> >>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi-
> >>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system
> >>> during the runtime of the application.
> >> Sold!!
> >>
> >>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004.
> >>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out,
> >>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application
> >>> for performing psychological operations over the internet.
> >>>
> >>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available
> >>> now a days.
> >> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how 
> >> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope.
> >>
> >>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain
> >>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well
> >>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog.
> >> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is 
> >> derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting 
> >> primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological 
> >> order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for 
> >> specific page elements to be present.
> >>
> >>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping
> >>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip-
> >>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me-
> >>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images
> >>> as what ever you could think of.
> >> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your 
> >> website, whatever will you geniuses think of next.
> >>
> >>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link
> >>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one
> >>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target
> >>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown
> >>> as a nonquery url, like:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/something-new/while-i-wrote-it-here.html
> >> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not 
> >> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion.
> >>
> >>> Done without mod_rewrite.
> >> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is 
> >> this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be 
> >> interested to know which you are using and what you have against 
> >> mod_rewrite.
> >>
> >>  > I hope I answered all your questions.
> >>
> >> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort.
> >>
> >>  > Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Yours sarcastically,
> >>
> >> -Stut
> >>
> >>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut:
> >>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list...
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is
> >>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line
> >>>> 3) Make sure it's in English
> >>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one
> >>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care!
> >>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the 
> >>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works, 
> >>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product!
> >>>>
> >>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful...
> >>>>
> >>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories?
> >>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"?
> >>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding 
> >>>> URLs. Do you have a reference?
> >>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to 
> >>>> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because 
> >>>> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you 
> >>>> could well be!
> >>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please.
> >>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of 
> >>>> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs?
> >>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Stut
> >>>>
> >>
> > 
> 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux