Hi Stut, if you check out http://getvanilla.com/ this is a forum software which uses mod_rewrite to show everything in fine ass written urls, like my system does allready in a better way. As I know from the google indexing threads running over my websites, the robot indexes all pathes as long there are found contents. If you have a query like http://www.domain.com/en/folder1/folder2/document-name.html and the application shows contents over this url: http://www.domain.com/index.php?lang=en&pid=XYZ while document XYZ belongs to category automobiles and is a BMX Nissan If now the search robot is comming is crawling the http://www.domain.com/ finds a hole bunch of links to /en/automobiles/bmx-nissan/XYZ.html decides to look into /en/ first, and figures out, here there is absolutely nothing in it. The same thing happens to the /en/automobiles/ folder till it at the late end reaches the document-name.html So the indexing provider decides, that these categories are only getting missused to point out informations which are not really there. So its a fraud. I could advertise pictures off dolly buster to all people searching for BMX-Nissan. While when the indexing service comes and I call the document bmx-nissan.html and on the site only is to read dolly buster has a dot on her ass, the website will sink in the respect of the search engine. I hope you understood what I said. My websites are working in a slightly different way. I am creating overview pages in every category which says, I have an overview page showing all car brands in automobile, in the BMX-Nissan sektion there is an overview page over all BMX-Nissan Cars which are pointing out to one of the XYZ's Yes, Stut you are right you could see it as a front controller pattern, while it actually is reappearing in any folder shown on my websites. Its great to talk to you stut :) Best Regards, Sascha Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 10:57 +0100 schrieb Stut: > Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote: > > The pages are all delivered by one single kind of page parser. > > > > Its consisting of round about 5 lines of code. But for different > > reasons there have to get written parsers, especially for the > > content to show. The longest parser is consisting of 11 lines > > of code. > > > > But I don't want to say more, otherwise my invention is not mine > > anymore. Me alone as a developer can't react fast enough, to ar- > > chive the success, I normaly ought to have, before everybody is > > running to archive the same innovations like me. > > This is not your invention so I'm not sure what you think you're > protecting. It's known as the Front Controller pattern and is widely > used with and without a query string in both PHP and many other > languages. It can also require changes to the web server environment to > make it work. Google for "front controller pattern" for more information. > > You didn't say what you have against mod_rewrite. I'll bet you > mod_rewrite can parse a request and send it to the right script faster > than your PHP implementation. > > > But as I can see how you are reacting on it, and others as well > > everybody is really loves the behavior. Its long time ago that > > I spoke with other devs. So I really feel well about the conver- > > sation. > > You're not quite catching on to my opinion of your "product", but I'm > glad you "feel well about the conversation". > > > Thank you very much. > > You're quite welcome. > > -Stut > > > Am Dienstag, den 11.09.2007, 09:34 +0100 schrieb Stut: > >> Sascha Braun - CEO @ Braun Networks wrote: > >>> hi stut, > >>> > >>> thank you for your advices. > >> Ok, just so it's perfectly clear to you... I'm taking the piss. Still, > >> since you provided apparently serious answers I'm going to continue to > >> enjoy myself... > >> > >>> - Screentexts are texts shown as link texts or descriptions > >>> in forms and other page elements which remain static in one > >>> language area. The screentexts are getting replaced by they' > >>> re coresponding translations as the user selects a different > >>> language. > >> Wow, a multi-lingual website, how innovative of you. And look, you gave > >> the text on the page a name, how twee. > >> > >>> - The Google standard, of websites describes, that Query URL's > >>> like ?param1=XYZ¶m2=123 or as in $_SERVER['QUERY_STRING'] > >>> are not human readable, which makes them not acceptable as valid > >>> content links. > >> Nope, sorry, not a standard. When you claim something is standards > >> compliant you really should make sure the standards it's complying with > >> are actually standards backed by a reputable organisation. > >> > >>> But as I am pretty familar with search engine optimisation, my > >>> system is creating metatags for every page, h1 tags are used > >>> for headlines, h2 tags for subheads and so on. > >> Please, for the love of $DEITY get yourself an English spelling checker > >> and use it. I'd also recommend a grammar checker. > >> > >>> If you are a professional in search engine optimisation, you > >>> will not find any weakness in my application anymore. > >>> > >>> Its happending absolutely automatically the authors don't have > >>> to do anything, for make it happen. Stopword lists like in my- > >>> sql are removing useless keywords and so on. > >> Wow, so the user doesn't need to worry about URLs or SEO optimisation. > >> You truly have created a masterpiece. As Gavin pointed out this sounds a > >> lot like a CMS and not a framework. > >> > >>> - Yes, my system is the only application framework worldwide > >>> with its capabilities. I added a neural networking functionality > >>> which makes it possible to autodecide which contents are inte- > >>> resting for the viewers on a page. > >> Yeah, sorry to destroy your delusions of grandeur, but that's not even > >> slightly unique (not that uniqueness has multiple levels, but I'm using > >> some artistic licence). I'm also fairly certain it's covered by numerous > >> patents, so you might not want to shout about it too loudly. > >> > >>> Fx: If a user is allergic, no products containing large amounts > >>> of the alergen are shown in the shop anymore. As well it is possi- > >>> ble to create psychological profiles from the users of the system > >>> during the runtime of the application. > >> Sold!! > >> > >>> I have read a paper from the department of defence, from year 2004. > >>> I first read it in the early beginning of this year. I figured out, > >>> that my application framework is the perfect psynet application > >>> for performing psychological operations over the internet. > >>> > >>> I guess I developed one of the biggest weapon systems available > >>> now a days. > >> I really have nothing useful to say here. If you can't see how > >> ridiculous (and hilarious) such a claim is then there really is no hope. > >> > >>> - As a blogging standard I would describe websites which contain > >>> a linklist to the left or the right of the blogs content as well > >>> as a calender and a search field. I guess this makes a blog. > >> Again, not a standard. The term Weblog (from which the word blogging is > >> derived) is (according to Wikipedia) "a web-based publication consisting > >> primarily of periodic articles (normally in reverse chronological > >> order)". There is no requirement for a particular page layout or for > >> specific page elements to be present. > >> > >>> - The shop system is widely using ajax for performing fast shopping > >>> actions, its possible to use videos or audiofiles as product descip- > >>> tion media, as well as soon you change product parameters these me- > >>> dias are getting replaced by different color media or size images > >>> as what ever you could think of. > >> Again with the uniqueness - you're on fire! A customisable shop for your > >> website, whatever will you geniuses think of next. > >> > >>> And as well my system is using XLinks, which means, you add a link > >>> to a document, you are able to select the target document from one > >>> of the content modules, automatically the headline of the target > >>> document is used as link description and as well the link is shown > >>> as a nonquery url, like: > >>> > >>> http://www.domain.com/en/magazin/something-new/while-i-wrote-it-here.html > >> Ah, so by "nonquery" you actually mean "without a query string". Not > >> really the same thing so I'm glad you cleared up the confusion. > >> > >>> Done without mod_rewrite. > >> Being serious for a second (don't worry, it's just for a second), how is > >> this accomplished? I know there are several ways to do this but I'd be > >> interested to know which you are using and what you have against > >> mod_rewrite. > >> > >> > I hope I answered all your questions. > >> > >> That would be a bit of a stretch, but I appreciate the effort. > >> > >> > Best Regards, > >> > >> Yours sarcastically, > >> > >> -Stut > >> > >>> Am Montag, den 10.09.2007, 16:39 +0100 schrieb Stut: > >>>> Things to do before spamming a public English mailing list... > >>>> > >>>> 1) Make sure your email actually says what the product is > >>>> 2) Make sure you have a relevant subject line > >>>> 3) Make sure it's in English > >>>> 4) Run it through a spelling checker, preferably an English one > >>>> 5) Stop and think whether the people you're spamming are really gonna care! > >>>> 6) This one is really important. Make sure you include a URL to the > >>>> product's website. Oh, and make sure that website actually works, > >>>> especially when it says it's powered by your product! > >>>> > >>>> Some additional questions and notes that you may find useful... > >>>> > >>>> * What the heck are "Kategories"? Maybe you mean categories? > >>>> * What the heck are "Screentexts"? > >>>> * As far as I know Google have never published any standards regarding > >>>> URLs. Do you have a reference? > >>>> * Claiming that your product is the only one in the whole wide world to > >>>> do something is very dangerous. Would you bet the farm on it? Because > >>>> what with the numerous highly litigious patent owners out there you > >>>> could well be! > >>>> * "blogging standards"?? Another reference needed please. > >>>> * "The shop system is not containing query urls anymore, without use of > >>>> mod_rewrite." What the heck does that mean? You had SQL in your URLs? > >>>> * It's the best is it? On what do you base that claim? > >>>> > >>>> -Stut > >>>> > >> > > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
