Steve Edberg wrote: > At 7:37 PM -0400 7/5/07, Robert Cummings wrote: >>On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 16:27 -0700, Steve Edberg wrote: >>> Proposal - >>> >>> Perhaps we could separate Brain Teasers, Obfuscated PHP challenges, >>> and what-have-you to a separate mailing list, say php-fun (php-phun? >>> PHPhun?)? Maybe you could also include 'use of eval()' in that list, >>> since I think 97.004% of the time using eval() inevitably leads to >>> obfuscation. And one should eschew obfuscation. >> >>We could... but why bother?! >> > > > Minimizing the circumlocution and periphrasis that is characteristic > of an exhaustively obfuscated style is conducive to a maximally > productive ISO-9000/six-sigma enterprise infrastructure that is > architected towards the rightsized core competencies of an n-tier > profit maximization strategy. > > Errr, wait, I think I just wandered into the 'PHP as a strategic > BUSINESS language' thread... That almost made more sense when ROTed :-) Cheers -- David Robley "It's a bloody lion," said Tom categorically. Today is Boomtime, the 41st day of Confusion in the YOLD 3173. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
