On Thursday 26 April 2007 20:24, Justin Frim wrote: > tedd wrote: > > At 5:06 PM +0200 4/26/07, Tijnema ! wrote: > >> It's not XHTML 1.0 Strict valid .. :P > >> You're page is HTML 4.01 valid, i think you should make it XHTML 1.0 > >> Strict. > > > > Argggg. Then I would have to add all those "/" to my ">" in all my > > code in all my sites. Literally millions of new "/" would have to be > > added. That act could possibly crash the net. > > > > So, until someone points out a good reason for me to change (I'm open > > for redirection), I'll continue to use what works for me. Besides, > > it's still compliant, isn't it? > > Call me crazy, but I use HTML 4.01 Transitional. > It's messy as ever, but it works. And I've never had a browser bark > over my <br> or <br/> or <br /> > I'll also admit I don't have enough CSS knowledge yet to make page > layouts with completely dynamic positioning that actually look good, > regardless of the browser window size and aspect ratio. You know, > tables do a fantastic job of controlling layout. :-) > > (I'm expecting several hate-mail replies now.) Whatever makes the site tick if you ask me... table or not. btw. tables DOES a great job on the layout front... and even better printing assmuch info from a database -- --- Børge http://www.arivene.net --- -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
