On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 21:28 -0500, Anna V wrote: > On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 18:53 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > > > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 3:40 pm, Robert Cummings wrote: > > > > > > > > BTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a reasonable > > amount of > > > > > practice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as table based > > layouts > > > > > everyday of the week. I will refer you to > > http://www.csszengarden.com/ > > > > > > > > Only with hacks. > > > > > > Using tables for layout *is* a hack. A common one, but still a hack. > > > > No, it's old school, the only way to do complex layout in the past. At > > least tables are backward and forward compatible. CSS is only > > semi-forward compatible. > > > > Cheers, > > Rob. > > > > > I've never never had used tables for layouts (I worked on pretty > complicated projects)... Heck, http://espn.com is CSS based, and it looks > pretty darn amazing. Just my quick thought on this. :) They certainly use CSS AND they use table for the main layout. Thank you, thank you very much. Cheers, Rob. --
Looks like, the only table they use is for the ad_container. -- Anna Vester Web Designer http://www.veanndesign.com
