Re: CSS vs. Tables OT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/17/07, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 18:53 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 3:40 pm, Robert Cummings wrote:
>
> > > BTW, any web developer worth his or her salt with a reasonable
amount of
> > > practice can make CSS layouts that resize as well as table based
layouts
> > > everyday of the week. I will refer you to
http://www.csszengarden.com/
> >
> > Only with hacks.
>
> Using tables for layout *is* a hack.  A common one, but still a hack.

No, it's old school, the only way to do complex layout in the past. At
least tables are backward and forward compatible. CSS is only
semi-forward compatible.

Cheers,
Rob.


I've never never had used tables for layouts (I worked on pretty
complicated projects)... Heck, http://espn.com is CSS based, and it looks
pretty darn amazing.  Just my quick thought on this. :)
--
Anna Vester
Web Designer
http://www.veanndesign.com

[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux