On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 22:53 -0500, markw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 17:31 -0500, markw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > Your claim is that in ALL cases using a file system to store images > >> > is preferable to using a database. As such, you claim that using a dB > >> > for storing images is "bad" practice. > >> > >> That is fairly close to my professional opinion, yes. There is, of > >> course, > >> always the exception to any rule, but in general, I would call storing > >> bitmaps in a database without a damn good reason, a bad practice, yes. > > > > Ah, you've changed your tune. Thanks for coming out. > > I haven't changed any tune what so ever. Uhm, ooooookaaaaaay dooookaaaaaaaay then. I guess it's a good thing that the archives tell the real story... not to mention the readers of the list don't exactly have short memories. Cheers, Rob. -- .------------------------------------------------------------. | InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com | :------------------------------------------------------------: | An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting | | a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services | | such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn | | also provides an extremely flexible architecture for | | creating re-usable components quickly and easily. | `------------------------------------------------------------' -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php