Vail, Warren wrote: > I believe they this particular editor uses a html rendering and editing > control that is a part of IE and windows (probably .net, but not sure). > Probably won't work in these other browsers, because they are committed to > their own editor. If you don't have IE, then you are stuck with the > textarea and coding your own html. I know this list includes lots of > individuals who like to remain off the beaten path (sometimes myself), but > you sometimes pay a price for that. > > http://www.phpnuke.org/modules.php?name=Statistics > > PHP Nuke's statistics page shows percentages of visits using various > editors, you may find interesting. [soapbox, not directed at Warran, Afan, or anybody in particular] How to lie with statistics 101. Ya know, I get more and more irked every day by the repeated use of low percentages of browser users as a reason for non-standard usage. The fact is, if you multiply that percentage by the number of page views, suddenly it's a different scenario! Also, every person I see who pulls out these stats does so because their site doesn't support other browsers. Well, duh. If your site doesn't work with my browser, I go away, and you get a lot less page views from my browser. But let's assume that reliable percentages for standards-compliant works-in-all-browsers sites were actually available, and matched those percentages posted. Bottom Line: Translate percentages into numbers of user, and then decide. You'll make a different choice. .2% is nothing. .2% of 102369726 is quite a lot. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
