* Thus wrote Manuel Lemos: > Hello, > > On 11/14/2004 02:15 AM, Curt Zirzow wrote: > >>>If you even paid attention to Jason's message a simple google > >>>search for: > >>> > >>>smtp 550 5.7.1 unable to rely for > >>> > >>>returns a bunch more information than spam. > >> > >>FYI, that is a common error message that SMTP servers return when they > >>only allow relaying messages to remote addresses after prior > >>authentication. > > > > > >correct. prior authentication means you either authenticated via > >smtp or have access other ways.. pop relay, fall within a certain > >ip range.. etc... > > > > > > > >>Requiring authentication is one common solution to not leave > >>relaying opened. > > > > > >Common but not the *only* way. > > That is irrelevant because most servers that issue the message above > only allow relaying with prior authentication. > > FYI, the class that I suggested implements both SMTP and POP3 based > authentication. > > Maybe if you try them you will realize that I am provide a plain simple > solution for the problem of the original poster because it consists only > in replacing the mail() calls to the smtp_mail() provided with these > classes: you know we're going down the same road that took up to much of my time from the last time. You simply dont comprehend that your solution is *not* the only solution and take offence to that. > > >>If you really knew how SMTP servers work, you would have avoided making > >>a fool of yourself with yet another personal attack against somebody > >>that is offering a practical solution that solves the original poster > >>problem. > > > > > >my god.. you take it as a personal attack that I provide someone > >else an alternative method of finding out what there problem is? > > Are you still trying to insult my intelligence? no.. just trying to expand other people intelligence. > > Sometimes I forget names. But then when I notice the pattern of labeling > as spam my messages helping others in PHP mailing lists, some bells ring. This is the very first time i ever labeled your stuff as spam. > > There aren't many people that get keep protesting against my messages of > helping others with ready to use PHP components that I have developed > for many years to solve problems like they present. I have no problem with your solutions, I've simply stated that it may not be the only solution. > Then I remember that you are one of that elite of arrogant individuals > that do not want me to help others proposing the use of my components > because you belong to the "anti-Manuel Lemos bandwagon" as you declared > yourself in the bottom of this message: > > http://news.php.net/php.general/190968 You're personal issues are none of my business, i simply povide alternatives. Dont forget you accused me of being a some sort of pear freak. > > Although, I am almost used to people like yourself, it is always kind of > surprising to see that how much certain people act as if I am threat to > their existence in the PHP world. hehe.. php world? I'm only here to help people. > > You ought to know me better in person to realize how pointless are your > personal attacks against me. My lemma is that "cooperating is better > than competing". I do not have a problem if you really try to help > others, with your components or whoever. I don't know why you have a > problem when I try to help with my components!?! As I have said time and time again.. you can always provide your solutions that you've developed or have accessable to people.. but dont mislead them thinking that your solution is the *only* way. Curt -- Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore." -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
