| It matters with respect to compression, I think, or even stretching a face if you shoot with too wide a lens too close to your subject. As one who does faces professionally I can tell you that the more right you get it in-camera the easier post-processing is. I always regret when I’m sloppy with lens choice because it makes my computer work so, so much more difficult. Many years ago I used a 135 and I loved it. Haven’t had one for years but would love to try it again. Lea your kids . my camera . we'll click
www.leamurphy.com On Apr 6, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Michael Hughes <michaelhughes7a@xxxxxxx> wrote: Stepping in 'where angels fear to tread' can I ask a naive question. In the context of digital photography and post processing does it make any difference. When I used film I found that I got good results with a 135 lens but for me the biggest advantage was the fact that I could keep my subject at a distance so I was not, figuratively, Breathing down their neck. My viewpoint and experience is amateur rather than professional. I only ever got to 'shoot' professional models at auto show Press Days. |
