Randy, the 3800 is capable of wider than sRGB but not as wide as Adobe 1998... And it depends on the ink and paper... If you're printing on expensive art paper with artisan inks it can be very expensive while not being much better... When you set the profile for the printer, paper and ink, the color space is optimized for that setup...
On 11:02AM, Thu, Feb 5, 2015 Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well cant help if you are using out of date monitors and print profiles. The whole point of 8 and 9 color printers is that they have large gamuts. My 10 bit monitor and displayport to my 3800 which does 16 bit and adobergb gamut are well beyond sRGB.
On Feb 5, 2015 11:41 AM, "karl shah-jenner" <shahjen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
First good monitors are all about 98% of adobergb. Apple monitors are not
in that category even though they a very accurate at sRGB.
Second
who still owns a 4 color inkjet. the 3800 on glossy stock covers pretty
much most of adobe rgb. sRGB is smaller then swop 2 or sheet fed standard
profiles.
color printers all tend to be referred to inaccurately as CMYK printers.. this makes it easier than referring to them as CLcMLmYKLkRG printers or whatever color range of inks get jammed into the 8+ ink carts of todays printers.
And sure, there's a plethora of greens in printers that lay outside some RGB gamuts including some mesmerizing green-yellows, that doesn't make them necessarily unusable - unless you use a color space that as well as squishing, ignores outliers.
I used to produce my images on q 10 bit graphics card, a matrox parhelia coupled to a rather nice 24" CRT. I gave that up since most of the people at that time I linked pictures to were using 3DFX cards with no color fidelity on 17" LCDs.. what's the point? I work to the lowest common denominator now.
