Re: PHOTOFORUM digest 6654

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




One day in 1980 I spent an afternoon in Avedon’s studio watching him shoot a portrait and I learned something by watching him work. What did I see? I saw him purposely mask what his shutter button hand was doing so the sitter would not see when the shutter button was being pressed. Sometimes he looked away from the sitter to distract her and let her relax. The camera was on a studio stand, the sitter lit by only one light and as I recall that was a very large umbrella called an Octo. Avedon was shooting with a Rollei but acted like he might be shooting sheet film.
Needless to say, the next day I went whipping back to Fotocare to buy myself an Octo before returning to Copenhagen. But they had none and so I had to wait about 20 years before I actually got one. Into the breach stepped a Plume style softbox and it ended up lighting almost every portrait I ever shot including the Dalai Lama.  



On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

sure Vas the lens.   Then you gotta make sure she holds perfect as you drop the film and release the shutter.  Doable and just as likely. 


On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:37 PM, James Schenken <jds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Setting aside the airbrush issue on which I have no information,
Is it possible to get that kind of blurring effect by the use of some sort of diffusing vignette device?  I'm not suggesting it was done that way but just wondering about the possibilities.

BTW it is a gorgeous image.

CPAP Therapy is a way to live.

On Nov 26, 2014, at 1:24 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

LOL so the air brush wasn't invented in 1950 yet?   No one was air brushing in 1950 is that what you are saying?   Cause that is CRAZY NUTS.  That shot has been airbrushed.  you go from a hardline to a soft line back to a hard line.   So its either bleached or airbrushed SAME DIFF.   All you have to do is compare difference edition and see that not one looks the same but only similar and it real obvious they are airbrushed.   

Hell here is on that is backwards.  The backgrounds are obviously different as is the chest area.      http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ls432v4O831qivmgqo1_1280.jpg

Or this one that is closer that is still different 


you can speculate on what she means on the handwritten notes but when you have a note that says.  I like this one better then the original.   I;m going with airbrushed. 






Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints
------
Art for Cars: art4carz.com
Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com
Camera Works - The Washington Post

.






[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux