Andy I agree but when the comments are things lIke Poorly exposed and the image clearly has complete tonal range One has to wonder what the intent of the critique is? The note clearly state this is e6 at iso 400 and so we know contrast will be high. High contrast doesn't mean poor exposure does it? Using nice words to be antagonistic doesn't make the comments any less antagonistic.
There was ZERO helpful comment in what he said its said in an passive aggressive way. All you have to do is compare it to all his other comments and its pretty clear its an attack. On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I want to to thank Andrew for taking the time and making the effort to share his personal opinions and comments about the photographs in the PF hi it space. It should be noted that work shown there may not necessarily be finished work but is often contributed to show work in progress or that authors seek some feedback on. Opinions, suggestions and feedback is often the driving force for author contributions. Those who make the effort to provide such things should be recognized for without their contributions the usefulness of the exhibits would be significantly diminished.
So thank you again Andrew ... As well as all others who, in a courteous and civil manner, share their take on our photographs!
Andy
